← All case studies

E-commerce · Cordless tools

The cordless mini blower everyone wanted for their car

At the start there was a single message: a powerful blower with no clear purpose. By studying the searches it became the blower for cars, for leaves and for snow, each with its own message and its own bias.

Period: Apr 2025 – todayUS, Canada, Australia, UKThe client's name is confidential.

Ad spend managed, Apr 2025 to today
$1.11M
Sales generated
$3.72M
Return
3.34x
Non-brand return
2.29x

In 30 seconds

  • What it sells: a small cordless blower that runs on the power tool batteries you already have in the garage.
  • What I did: at the start there was a single, generic message. I split it into one angle per use and per season (cars, leaves, snow, and turbo all year), each with its own psychological bias.
  • The result: with $1.11M of spend we generated $3.72M in sales, a 3.34x return.

The starting question

How do you sell a blower that does everything, when nobody knows what they need it for?

How it went

  1. 01

    At the start, a single message

    I took on the account in April 2025. There were only a few campaigns, and they all said the same thing: a powerful blower, compatible with the most popular tool batteries. On its own, put like that, it said nothing: it didn't explain what it was for.

    It's a problem psychology knows well. When it isn't clear what you'll get, the brain prefers not to choose. It's called ambiguity aversion. To the person looking at it, a product that does everything doesn't do anything in particular.

  2. 02

    Analysis: what people really search for

    Before changing the ads, I studied the market. I read the account's search terms, used Keyword Planner, Semrush and Google Trends, and looked at what competitors were doing.

    Four big families of searches came out of it: people who wanted to dry their car, people who wanted to clear leaves from the garden, people who had to get rid of snow, and people simply looking for the most powerful blower. From there I built everything with the same four steps.

    1. 1AnalysisSearch terms, Keyword Planner, Semrush and competitors, to understand what people search for and when.
    2. 2CatalogueA product dedicated to each use in the feed, with titles written in the words people really use.
    3. 3ImagesPhotos with the right background: a wet car, a driveway full of leaves, snow. Some made with AI.
    4. 4LabelsOne label per use in the feed, to see each angle's results separately from the others.
  3. 03

    A year in four seasons

    Every use has its moment. So the year almost split itself.

    1. All yearTurboThe original power message stayed, but as an always-on base. It's the biggest campaign in the account: $145K of spend with a 2.56x return.
    2. Spring – autumnCars"Air blower for cars" kept showing up in the search terms. It became the main angle, the one that sells most from spring to autumn.
    3. AutumnLeavesGardens and driveways full of leaves. The most efficient angle of all, with a 3.40x return.
    4. WinterSnowWhen searches for "snow air blower" go up, dedicated titles, images and products switch on. Now that winter is coming, it's snow's turn.
  4. 04

    A different bias for every use

    Someone drying their car and someone clearing snow want different things. So each angle speaks to a different part of the brain.

    • Cars: loss aversion. The fear of scratching the paint with towels weighs more than the wish for a shiny car. The message is "dry it without touching the paint".
    • Leaves: the effort heuristic. We like what saves us effort. No rake and no bent back.
    • Snow: seasonal urgency. Being ready before the first snowfall, not after.
    • Turbo: the bandwagon effect. If lots of people use it, it feels like the right choice. In the test asset groups it was the strongest bias, with a 2.91x return.
  5. 05

    Why switching off what doesn't work matters

    Not every use worked. I tried dust in the garage and the workshop, and a summer test on barbecues, to get the coals going faster. Neither brought in enough sales, so I switched them off.

    To stop the client burning money, I judged every angle on three numbers: how much it spent, how much it sold and how much it returned. If it passed a certain spend without breaking even, I stopped it and used that budget to fund the next test.

    Clicks
    466K
    Spend
    $575K
    Sales
    $1.55M
    Return
    2.69x

    These are the first year's numbers, from April 2025 to April 2026.

  6. 06

    Us vs them

    We all tend to trust the group we identify with more, and the others less. Psychologists call it in-group bias. I used it in a comparison creative: on one side the product with three strengths and a green tick, on the other "other blowers" with three typical flaws and a red cross.

    I didn't name any competitor. Viewers picture the blower that let them down all by themselves, and that works better than any name.

    Variant AGeneric creative
    Conversion rate
    0.05%
    Return
    2.73x
    Test spend
    $4,193
    4x conversionsVariant BUs vs them
    Conversion rate
    0.20%
    Return
    4.39x
    Test spend
    $1,889

    Same audience and same Demand Gen budget: only the creatives changed.

  7. 07

    The same comparison on the landing pages

    Since it was working, from November 2025 I took the comparison onto the Performance Max landing pages too. They're editorial-style articles, along the lines of "6 reasons thousands are switching blowers", one for each use.

    Test spend
    $28.1K
    Sales
    $76.8K
    Return
    2.73x
    Above break-even
    +101%
    break-even at 1.36x

    The leaf page alone made up 28% of the experiment: $8.0K of spend and $22.4K in sales, a 2.80x return.

  8. 08

    December, the biggest month

    Spend
    $144K
    over 4x the monthly average
    Sales
    $370K
    Return
    2.57x
    Clicks
    95.7K

    In December the account spent more than four times its monthly average without losing return. Since September, sales had come mostly from leaves; in December snow arrived, while Turbo stayed on the whole time. With the angles already in place, I could raise the budget without losing efficiency.

  9. 09

    Year two: a new version

    In September 2026 a more premium version of the product came out. I prepared the whole Google launch, and the first Performance Max campaigns are doing better than the account's entire history: 3.58x on leaves and 3.55x on cars. All non-brand now runs on the new version, and since 20 October in Canada and the UK as well.

  10. 10

    The store as a whole

    Google Ads is one of the store's channels, not the only one. But the full picture is worth a look too: these are the store's total sales, across all channels.

    Sales Feb 2025 – Oct 2026
    $10.16M
    Orders fulfilled
    40,933
    Sales Feb – Oct 2026
    $6.99M
    +165% on the previous period
    Last 30 days
    $911K
    +461% on the year before

What I tested

Every lever in the account, and how it went

Filter to see what worked, what I tested without success and paused, and what is still running.

  • AngleWorked

    Turbo, all year

    The biggest campaign in the account, always on.

    $145K · 2.56x

  • AngleWorked

    Cars

    The main angle, strongest from spring to autumn.

    up to 3.55x

  • AngleWorked

    Leaves

    The most efficient angle, in autumn.

    3.40x

  • AngleWorked

    Snow

    It works in winter, so it only runs in season.

    2.50 – 2.90x

  • PsychologyWorked

    Us vs them

    Conversion rate four times higher than the generic creative.

    4.39x

  • PsychologyWorked

    One bias per asset group

    The bandwagon effect beat every other bias tested.

    2.91x

  • AngleDidn't work, paused

    Dust

    Garages and workshops didn't bring enough sales. Switched off.

  • AngleDidn't work, paused

    Barbecues, in summer

    A summer test that didn't bring enough results. Switched off.

  • PsychologyDidn't work, paused

    Loss aversion on Demand Gen

    It didn't work on this channel. Stopped after $1,200.

  • SearchesDidn't work, paused

    Searches with tool brand names

    About $1,200 spent for 2 conversions.

  • LandingDidn't work, paused

    New standalone landers

    They never got past 1.40x.

  • ChannelsDidn't work, paused

    YouTube and banners

    About $1,500 spent and no sales.

  • CountriesDidn't work, paused

    Australia

    Tested in 2025 and paused.

  • CountriesRunning

    New version in Canada and the UK

    Launched on 20 October 2026.

  • CountriesRunning

    California only

    Dedicated campaign, just launched.

x = return (ROAS): how many dollars of sales each dollar spent brings in. 3x means $3 in sales for $1 of advertising.

The lesson

Nobody buys a blower that does everything. A blower that dries your car without a scratch, they do.

What to take away

  1. Every client has their own needsProduct, margins, markets and seasons change from one account to the next. So I never start from a ready-made formula, but from how that business works.
  2. Ideas come from searchesFrom what people type into Google and from tools like Keyword Planner, Semrush and Google Trends, plus competitor research. That's where cars and snow showed up.
  3. The feed matters more than it seemsFeed titles, images and labels decide who sees the product and where, on Shopping and Performance Max. A feed tailored to each use is worth as much as a good ad.
  4. Psychology, not generic copyEvery angle starts from a specific bias: loss for cars, effort for leaves, urgency for snow. Copy that fits any product convinces nobody.

Want a similar result on your account?

Give me access to your Google Ads account and I'll prepare a free first audit with the next steps.

Get a free audit →