How it went
- 01
At the start, a single message
I took on the account in April 2025. There were only a few campaigns, and they all said the same thing: a powerful blower, compatible with the most popular tool batteries. On its own, put like that, it said nothing: it didn't explain what it was for.
It's a problem psychology knows well. When it isn't clear what you'll get, the brain prefers not to choose. It's called ambiguity aversion. To the person looking at it, a product that does everything doesn't do anything in particular.
- 02
Analysis: what people really search for
Before changing the ads, I studied the market. I read the account's search terms, used Keyword Planner, Semrush and Google Trends, and looked at what competitors were doing.
Four big families of searches came out of it: people who wanted to dry their car, people who wanted to clear leaves from the garden, people who had to get rid of snow, and people simply looking for the most powerful blower. From there I built everything with the same four steps.
- 1AnalysisSearch terms, Keyword Planner, Semrush and competitors, to understand what people search for and when.
- 2CatalogueA product dedicated to each use in the feed, with titles written in the words people really use.
- 3ImagesPhotos with the right background: a wet car, a driveway full of leaves, snow. Some made with AI.
- 4LabelsOne label per use in the feed, to see each angle's results separately from the others.
- 03
A year in four seasons
Every use has its moment. So the year almost split itself.
- All yearTurboThe original power message stayed, but as an always-on base. It's the biggest campaign in the account: $145K of spend with a 2.56x return.
- Spring – autumnCars"Air blower for cars" kept showing up in the search terms. It became the main angle, the one that sells most from spring to autumn.
- AutumnLeavesGardens and driveways full of leaves. The most efficient angle of all, with a 3.40x return.
- WinterSnowWhen searches for "snow air blower" go up, dedicated titles, images and products switch on. Now that winter is coming, it's snow's turn.
- 04
A different bias for every use
Someone drying their car and someone clearing snow want different things. So each angle speaks to a different part of the brain.
- Cars: loss aversion. The fear of scratching the paint with towels weighs more than the wish for a shiny car. The message is "dry it without touching the paint".
- Leaves: the effort heuristic. We like what saves us effort. No rake and no bent back.
- Snow: seasonal urgency. Being ready before the first snowfall, not after.
- Turbo: the bandwagon effect. If lots of people use it, it feels like the right choice. In the test asset groups it was the strongest bias, with a 2.91x return.
- 05
Why switching off what doesn't work matters
Not every use worked. I tried dust in the garage and the workshop, and a summer test on barbecues, to get the coals going faster. Neither brought in enough sales, so I switched them off.
To stop the client burning money, I judged every angle on three numbers: how much it spent, how much it sold and how much it returned. If it passed a certain spend without breaking even, I stopped it and used that budget to fund the next test.
- Clicks
- 466K
- Spend
- $575K
- Sales
- $1.55M
- Return
- 2.69x
These are the first year's numbers, from April 2025 to April 2026.
- 06
Us vs them
We all tend to trust the group we identify with more, and the others less. Psychologists call it in-group bias. I used it in a comparison creative: on one side the product with three strengths and a green tick, on the other "other blowers" with three typical flaws and a red cross.
I didn't name any competitor. Viewers picture the blower that let them down all by themselves, and that works better than any name.
Variant AGeneric creative- Conversion rate
- 0.05%
- Return
- 2.73x
- Test spend
- $4,193
4x conversionsVariant BUs vs them- Conversion rate
- 0.20%
- Return
- 4.39x
- Test spend
- $1,889
Same audience and same Demand Gen budget: only the creatives changed.
- 07
The same comparison on the landing pages
Since it was working, from November 2025 I took the comparison onto the Performance Max landing pages too. They're editorial-style articles, along the lines of "6 reasons thousands are switching blowers", one for each use.
- Test spend
- $28.1K
- Sales
- $76.8K
- Return
- 2.73x
- Above break-even
- +101% break-even at 1.36x
The leaf page alone made up 28% of the experiment: $8.0K of spend and $22.4K in sales, a 2.80x return.
- 08
December, the biggest month
- Spend
- $144K over 4x the monthly average
- Sales
- $370K
- Return
- 2.57x
- Clicks
- 95.7K
In December the account spent more than four times its monthly average without losing return. Since September, sales had come mostly from leaves; in December snow arrived, while Turbo stayed on the whole time. With the angles already in place, I could raise the budget without losing efficiency.
- 09
Year two: a new version
In September 2026 a more premium version of the product came out. I prepared the whole Google launch, and the first Performance Max campaigns are doing better than the account's entire history: 3.58x on leaves and 3.55x on cars. All non-brand now runs on the new version, and since 20 October in Canada and the UK as well.
- 10
The store as a whole
Google Ads is one of the store's channels, not the only one. But the full picture is worth a look too: these are the store's total sales, across all channels.
- Sales Feb 2025 – Oct 2026
- $10.16M
- Orders fulfilled
- 40,933
- Sales Feb – Oct 2026
- $6.99M +165% on the previous period
- Last 30 days
- $911K +461% on the year before